![]()
COMPILATIONS
FROM THE BAHÁ'Í WRITINGS
|
COMPILATION
ON
ANIMALS
This compilation gathers a selection
of references to animals in the Bahá'í Writings,
including the ways these are referred
to both symbolically and literally.
CONTENTS
Approach
to animals
Place
of animals in the creation
Distinction
between animals and humans
Need
for man to rise above the animal state
Animals
as symbols or metaphors
Hunting
Eating
meat
Animal
experimentation
Unless ye must,
Bruise not the serpent in the dust,
How much less wound a man.
And if ye can,
No ant should ye alarm,
Much less a brother harm.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, page 256)
![]()
Burden not an animal with more than it
can bear. We, truly, have prohibited such treatment through a most binding
interdiction in the Book. Be ye the embodiments of justice and fairness
amidst all creation.
(Baha'u'llah, The
Kitáb-i-Aqdas, paragraph 187 , page 87)
![]()
He should show kindness to animals, how
much more unto his fellow-man, to him who is endowed with the power of
utterance.
(Baha'u'llah, Gleanings,
page 265)
![]()
He should show kindness to animals, how
much more unto his fellow-man, to him who is endowed with the power of
utterance.
(Baha'u'llah, The
Kitab-i-Iqan, page 194)
![]()
Briefly, it is not only their fellow human beings that the beloved of God must treat with mercy and compassion, rather must they show forth the utmost loving-kindness to every living creature. For in all physical respects, and where the animal spirit is concerned, the selfsame feelings are shared by animal and man. Man hath not grasped this truth, however, and he believeth that physical sensations are confined to human beings, wherefore is he unjust to the animals, and cruel.
And yet in truth, what difference is there when it cometh to physical sensations? The feelings are one and the same, whether ye inflict pain on man or on beast. There is no difference here whatever. And indeed ye do worse to harm an animal, for man hath a language, he can lodge a complaint, he can cry out and moan; if injured he can have recourse to the authorities and these will protect him from his aggressor. But the hapless beast is mute, able neither to express its hurt nor take its case to the authorities. If a man inflict a thousand ills upon a beast, it can neither ward him off with speech nor hale him into court. Therefore is it essential that ye show forth the utmost consideration to the animal, and that ye be even kinder to him than to your fellow man.
Train your children from their earliest days to be infinitely tender and loving to animals. If an animal be sick, let the children try to heal it, if it be hungry, let them feed it, if thirsty, let them quench its thirst, if weary, let them see that it rests.
Most human beings are sinners, but the
beasts are innocent. Surely those without sin should receive the most kindness
and love - all except animals which are harmful, such as bloodthirsty wolves,
such as poisonous snakes, and similar pernicious creatures, the reason
being that kindness to these is an injustice to human beings and to other
animals as well. If, for example, ye be tender-hearted toward a wolf, this
is but tyranny to a sheep, for a wolf will destroy a whole flock of sheep.
A rabid dog, if given the chance, can kill a thousand animals and men.
Therefore, compassion shown to wild and ravening beasts is cruelty to the
peaceful ones - and so the harmful must be dealt with. But to blessed animals
the utmost kindness must be shown, the more the better. Tenderness and
loving-kindness are basic principles of God's heavenly Kingdom. Ye should
most carefully bear this matter in mind.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, pages 158-160)
![]()
Educate the children in their infancy in such a way that they may become exceedingly kind and merciful to the animals. If the animal is sick they should endeavour to cure it; if it is hungry they should feed it; if it is thirsty, they should satisfy its thirst; if it is tired they should give it rest.
Man is generally sinful and the animal
is innocent; unquestionably one must be more kind and merciful to the innocent.
The harmful animals, such as the bloodthirsty wolf, the poisonous snake
and other injurious animals are excepted, because mercy towards these is
cruelty to man, and other animals.
(The Baha'i World, Vol. 9, p. 544)
(`Abdu'l-Baha, in
Education, Compilation of Compilations, pages 310-311)
![]()
The majority of the diseases which overtake
man also overtake the animal, but the animal is not cured by drugs. In
the mountains, as in the wilderness, the animal's physician is the power
of taste and smell. The sick animal smells the plants that grow in the
wilderness; he eats those that are sweet and fragrant to his smell and
taste, and is cured.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Some
Answered Questions, page 258)
![]()
The proof of this is that while other animals
have never studied medical science, nor carried on researches into diseases
or medicines, treatments or cures - even so, when one of them falleth a
prey to sickness, nature leadeth it, in fields or desert places, to the
very plant which, once eaten, will rid the animal of its disease. The explanation
is that if, as an example, the sugar component in the animal's body hath
decreased, according to a natural law the animal hankereth after a herb
that is rich in sugar. Then, by a natural urge, which is the appetite,
among a thousand different varieties of plants across the field, the animal
will discover and consume that herb which containeth a sugar component
in large amounts. Thus the essential balance of the substances composing
its body is re-established, and the animal is rid of its disease.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, page 154)
![]()
And likewise, when the constitution is
in a state of equilibrium, there is no doubt that whatever is relished
will be beneficial to health. Observe how an animal will graze in a field
where there are a hundred thousand kinds of herbs and grasses, and how,
with its sense of smell, it snuffeth up the odours of the plants, and tasteth
them with its sense of taste; then it consumeth whatever herb is pleasurable
to these senses, and benefiteth therefrom. Were it not for this power of
selectivity, the animals would all be dead in a single day; for there are
a great many poisonous plants, and animals know nothing of the pharmacopoeia.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, page 155)
![]()
Even over animals, music has an effect.
For example: When they wish to take a camel over a desert road, they attach
to him some bells, or they play upon a flute, and this sound prevents him
from realizing the fatigue of the journey; his nerves are affected, but
he does not have an increase of thought, he feels nothing but physical
sensation.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, in
Music, Compilation of Compilations, page 79)
![]()
PLACE OF ANIMALS IN THE CREATION
Consider for instance how one group of created things constituteth the vegetable kingdom, and another the animal kingdom. Each of these two maketh use of certain elements in the air on which its own life dependeth, while each increaseth the quantity of such elements as are essential for the life of the other. In other words, the growth and development of the vegetable world is impossible without the existence of the animal kingdom, and the maintenance of animal life is inconceivable without the co-operation of the vegetable kingdom. Of like kind are the relationships that exist among all created things. Hence it was stated that co-operation and reciprocity are essential properties which are inherent in the unified system of the world of existence, and without which the entire creation would be reduced to nothingness.
In surveying the vast range of creation
thou shalt perceive that the higher a kingdom of created things is on the
arc of ascent, the more conspicuous are the signs and evidences of the
truth that co-operation and reciprocity at the level of a higher order
are greater than those that exist at the level of a lower order. For example
the evident signs of this fundamental reality are more discernible in the
vegetable kingdom than in the mineral, and still more manifest in the animal
world than in the vegetable.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, in
Huququ'llah, Compilation of Compilations, page 509)
![]()
Thus this flower once upon a time was of
the soil. The animal eats the flower or its fruit, and it thereby ascends
to the animal kingdom. Man eats the meat of the animal, and there you have
its ascent into the human kingdom, because all phenomena are divided into
that which eats and that which is eaten. Therefore, every primordial atom
of these atoms, singly and indivisible, has had its coursings throughout
all the sentient creation, going constantly into the aggregation of the
various elements. Hence do you have the conservation of energy and the
infinity of phenomena, the indestructibility of phenomena, changeless and
immutable, because life cannot suffer annihilation but only change.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Foundations
of World Unity, page 52)
![]()
Reflect upon the inner realities of the universe, the secret wisdoms involved, the enigmas, the inter-relationships, the rules that govern all. For every part of the universe is connected with every other part by ties that are very powerful and admit of no imbalance, nor any slackening whatever. In the physical realm of creation, all things are eaters and eaten: the plant drinketh in the mineral, the animal doth crop and swallow down the plant, man doth feed upon the animal, and the mineral devoureth the body of man. Physical bodies are transferred past one barrier after another, from one life to another, and all things are subject to transformation and change, save only the essence of existence itself - since it is constant and immutable, and upon it is founded the life of every species and kind, of every contingent reality throughout the whole of creation.
Whensoever thou dost examine, through a
microscope, the water man drinketh, the air he doth breathe, thou wilt
see that with every breath of air, man taketh in an abundance of animal
life, and with every draught of water, he also swalloweth down a great
variety of animals. How could it ever be possible to put a stop to this
process? For all creatures are eaters and eaten, and the very fabric of
life is reared upon this fact. Were it not so, the ties that interlace
all created things within the universe would be unravelled.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, page 157)
![]()
Although the mineral, vegetable, animal and man all have actual being, yet the mineral has no knowledge of the vegetable. It cannot apprehend it. It cannot imagine nor understand it.
It is the same with the vegetable. Any progress it may make, however highly it may become developed, it will never apprehend the animal, nor understand it. It is, so to speak, without news of it. It has no ears, no sight, no understanding.
It is the same with the animal. However much it may progress in its own kingdom, however refined its feelings may become, it will have no real notion of the world of man or of his special intellectual faculties.
The animal cannot understand the roundness of the earth, nor its motion in space, nor the central position of the sun, nor can it imagine such a thing as the all-pervading ether.
Although the mineral, vegetable, animal
and man himself are actual beings, the difference between their kingdoms
prevents members of the lower degree from comprehending the essence and
nature of those of the superior degree.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Abdu'l-Baha
in London, pages 22-23)
![]()
In the world of existence the animal is
a captive of nature. Its actions are according to the exigencies and requirements
of nature. It has no consideration or consciousness of good and evil. It
simply follows its natural instinct and inclination.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 40)
![]()
The pathway of nature is the pathway of
the animal realm. The animal acts in accordance with the requirements of
nature, follows its own instincts and desires. Whatever its impulses and
proclivities may be, it has the liberty to gratify them; yet it is a captive
of nature. It cannot deviate in the least degree from the road nature has
established. It is utterly lacking spiritual susceptibilities, ignorant
of divine religion and without knowledge of the Kingdom of God. The animal
possesses no power of ideation or conscious intelligence; it is a captive
of the senses and deprived of that which lies beyond them. It is subject
to what the eye sees, the ear hears, the nostrils sense, the taste detects
and touch reveals. These sensations are acceptable and sufficient for the
animal. But that which is beyond the range of the senses, that realm of
phenomena through which the conscious pathway to the Kingdom of God leads,
the world of spiritual susceptibilities and divine religion - of these
the animal is completely unaware, for in its highest station it is a captive
of nature.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 177)
![]()
DISTINCTION BETWEEN ANIMALS AND HUMANS
Ferocity has characterized men even more
than animals. The lion, tiger, bear and wolf are ferocious because of their
needs. Unless they are fierce, cruel and unrelenting, they will die of
starvation. The lion cannot graze; its teeth are fitted only for food of
flesh. This is also true of other wild animals. Ferocity is natural to
them as their means of subsistence; but human ferocity proceeds from selfishness,
greed and oppression. It springs from no natural necessity.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 103)
![]()
If the animals are savage and ferocious,
it is simply a means for their subsistence and preservation. They are deprived
of that degree of intellect which can reason and discriminate between right
and wrong, justice and injustice; they are justified in their actions and
not responsible. When man is ferocious and cruel toward his fellowman,
it is not for subsistence or safety. His motive is selfish advantage and
willful wrong.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 352)
![]()
The world of nature is the kingdom of the
animal. In its natural condition and plane of limitation the animal is
perfect. The ferocious beasts of prey have been completely subject to the
laws of nature in their development. They are without education or training;
they have no power of abstract reasoning and intellectual ideals; they
have no touch with the spiritual world and are without conception of God
or the Holy Spirit. The animal can neither recognize nor apprehend the
spiritual power of man and makes no distinction between man and itself,
for the reason that its susceptibilities are limited to the plane of the
senses. It lives under the bondage of nature and nature's laws. All the
animals are materialists. They are deniers of God and without realization
of a transcendent power in the universe. They have no knowledge of the
divine Prophets and Holy Books - mere captives of nature and the sense
world. In reality they are like the great philosophers of this day who
are not in touch with God and the Holy Spirit - deniers of the Prophets,
ignorant of spiritual susceptibilities, deprived of the heavenly bounties
and without belief in the supernatural power. The animal lives this kind
of life blissfully and untroubled, whereas the material philosophers labor
and study for ten or twenty years in schools and colleges, denying God,
the Holy Spirit and divine inspirations. The animal is even a greater philosopher,
for it attains the ability to do this without labor and study. For instance,
the cow denies God and the Holy Spirit, knows nothing of divine inspirations,
heavenly bounties or spiritual emotions and is a stranger to the world
of hearts. Like the philosophers, the cow is a captive of nature and knows
nothing beyond the range of the senses. The philosophers, however, glory
in this, saying, "We are not captives of superstitions; we have implicit
faith in the impressions of the senses and know nothing beyond the realm
of nature, which contains and covers everything." But the cow, without
study or proficiency in the sciences, modestly and quietly views life from
the same standpoint, living in harmony with nature's laws in the utmost
dignity and nobility.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, pages 311-312)
![]()
Without the teachings of God the world
of humanity is like the animal kingdom. What difference is there between
the animal and man? The difference is this: that the animal is not capable
of apprehending the divine teachings, whereas man is worthy of them and
possesses the capacity to understand. In the animal kingdom there is no
such bestowal; therefore, there is limited progression. At most, evolution
in that kingdom is a development of the organism. In the beginning it is
small, undeveloped; it develops, becomes larger; but its sphere of intellectual
growth is limited. Therefore, the teachings of God are the bestowals specialized
for man.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 61)
![]()
The physical happiness of material conditions
was allotted to the animal. Consider how the animal has attained the fullest
degree of physical felicity. A bird perches upon the loftiest branch and
builds there its nest with consummate beauty and skill. All the grains
and seeds of the meadows are its wealth and food; all the fresh water of
mountain springs and rivers of the plain are for its enjoyment. Truly,
this is the acme of material happiness, to which even a human creature
cannot attain. This is the honor of the animal kingdom. But the honor of
the human kingdom is the attainment of spiritual happiness in the human
world, the acquisition of the knowledge and love of God.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 166)
![]()
The body is the physical or animal degree of man. From the bodily point of view man is a sharer of the animal kingdom. The bodies alike of men and animals are composed of elements held together by the law of attraction.
Like the animal, man possesses the faculties
of the senses, is subject to heat, cold, hunger, thirst, etc.; unlike the
animal, man has a rational soul, the human intelligence.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Paris
Talks, page 96)
![]()
Look also at the animals, how helpless they are in their apparent strength! For the elephant, the largest of all animals, is troubled by the fly, and the lion cannot escape the irritation of the worm. Even man, the highest form of created beings, needs many things for his very life; first of all he needs air, and if he is deprived of it for a few minutes, he dies. He is also dependent on water, food, clothing, warmth, and many other things. On all sides he is surrounded by dangers and difficulties, against which his physical body alone cannot cope. If a man looks at the world around him, he will see how all created things are dependent and are captive to the laws of Nature.
Man alone, by his spiritual power, has
been able to free himself, to soar above the world of matter and to make
it his servant.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Paris
Talks, page 20)
![]()
Man also shares in this creation; but it
is not possible for either of the lower kingdoms to understand that which
takes place in the mind of man. The animal cannot realize the intelligence
of a human being, he only knows that which is perceived by his animal senses,
he cannot imagine anything in the abstract. An animal could not learn that
the world is round, that the earth revolves round the sun, or the construction
of the electric telegraph. These things are only possible to man. Man is
the highest work of creation, the nearest to God of all creatures.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Paris
Talks, page 24)
![]()
NEED FOR MAN TO RISE ABOVE THE ANIMAL STATE
What are the animals' propensities? To
eat, drink, wander about and sleep. The thoughts, the minds of the animals
are confined to these. They are captives in the bonds of these desires.
Man becomes a prisoner and slave to them when his ultimate desire is no
higher than his welfare in this world of the senses. Consider how difficult
for man is the attainment of pleasures and happiness in this mortal world.
How easy it is for the animal. Look upon the fields and flowers, prairies,
streams, forests and mountains. The grazing animals, the birds of the air,
the fishes neither toil nor undergo hardships; they sow not, nor are they
concerned about the reaping; they have no anxiety about business or politics
- no trouble or worry whatsoever. All the fields and grasses, all the meadows
of fruits and grains, all the mountain slopes and streams of salubrious
water belong to them. They do not labor for their livelihood and happiness
because everything is provided and made possible for them. If the life
of man be confined to this physical, material outlook, the animal's life
is a hundred times better, easier and more productive of comfort and contentment.
The animal is nobler, more serene and confident because each hour is free
from anxiety and worriment; but man, restless and dissatisfied, runs from
morn till eve, sailing the seas, diving beneath them in submarines, flying
aloft in airplanes, delving into the lowest strata of the earth to obtain
his livelihood - all with the greatest difficulty, anxiety and unrest.
Therefore, in this respect the animal is nobler, more serene, poised and
confident. Consider the birds in the forest and jungle: how they build
their nests high in the swaying treetops, build them with the utmost skill
and beauty - swinging, rocking in the morning breezes, drinking the pure,
sweet water, enjoying the most enchanting views as they fly here and there
high overhead, singing joyously - all without labor, free from worry, care
and forebodings. If man's life be confined to the elemental, physical world
of enjoyment, one lark is nobler, more admirable than all humanity because
its livelihood is prepared, its condition complete, its accomplishment
perfect and natural.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, pages 184-185)
![]()
If man were to care for himself only he would be nothing but an animal for only the animals are thus egoistic. If you bring a thousand sheep to a well to kill nine hundred and ninety-nine the one remaining sheep would go on grazing, not thinking of the others and worrying not at all about the lost, never bothering that its own kind had passed away, or had perished or been killed. To look after one's self only is therefore an animal propensity. It is the animal propensity to live solitary and alone. It is the animal proclivity to look after one's own comfort. But man was created to be a man - to be fair, to be just, to be merciful, to be kind to all his species, never to be willing that he himself be well off while others are in misery and distress - this is an attribute of the animal and not of man. Nay, rather, man should be willing to accept hardships for himself in order that others may enjoy wealth; he should enjoy trouble for himself that others may enjoy happiness and well-being. This is the attribute of man. This is becoming of man. Otherwise man is not man - he is less than the animal.
The man who thinks only of himself and
is thoughtless of others is undoubtedly inferior to the animal because
the animal is not possessed of the reasoning faculty. The animal is excused;
but in man there is reason, the faculty of justice, the faculty of mercifulness.
Possessing all these faculties he must not leave them unused. He who is
so hard-hearted as to think only of his own comfort, such an one will not
be called man.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Foundations
of World Unity, page 42)
![]()
O ye beloved of God! Know ye, verily, that the happiness of mankind lieth in the unity and the harmony of the human race, and that spiritual and material developments are conditioned upon love and amity among all men. Consider ye the living creatures, namely those which move upon the earth and those which fly, those which graze and those which devour. Among the beasts of prey each kind liveth apart from other species of its genus, observing complete antagonism and hostility; and whenever they meet they immediately fight and draw blood, gnashing their teeth and baring their claws. This is the way in which ferocious beasts and bloodthirsty wolves behave, carnivorous animals that live by themselves and fight for their lives. But the docile, good-natured and gentle animals, whether they belong to the flying or grazing species, associate with one another in complete affinity, united in their flocks, and living their lives with enjoyment, happiness and contentment. Such are the birds that are satisfied with and grateful for a few grains; they live in complete gladness, and break into rich and melodious song while soaring over meadows, plains, hills and mountains. Similarly those animals which graze, like the sheep, the antelope and the gazelle, consort in the greatest amity, intimacy and unity while living in their plains and prairies in a condition of complete contentment. But dogs, wolves, tigers, hyenas and those other beasts of prey, are alienated from each other as they hunt and roam about alone. The creatures of the fields and birds of the air do not even shun or molest one another when they come upon their mutual grazing and resting grounds but accept each other with friendliness, unlike the devouring beasts who immediately tear each other apart when one intrudes upon the other's cave or lair; yea, even if one merely passeth by the abode of another the latter at once rusheth out to attack and if possible kill the former.
Therefore, it hath been made clear and manifest that in the animal kingdom also love and affinity are the fruits of a gentle disposition, a pure nature and praiseworthy character, while discord and isolation are characteristic of the fierce beasts of the wild.
The Almighty hath not created in man the
claws and teeth of ferocious animals, nay rather hath the human form been
fashioned and set with the most comely attributes and adorned with the
most perfect virtues. The honour of this creation and the worthiness of
this garment therefore require man to have love and affinity for his own
kind, nay rather, to act towards all living creatures with justice and
equity.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, pages 286-287)
![]()
ANIMALS AS SYMBOLS OR METAPHORS
In the realm of genesis and creation the
question of color is of least importance." "Throughout the animal kingdom,"
He explains, "we do not find the creatures separated because of color.
They recognize unity of species and oneness of kind. If we do not find
color distinction drawn in a kingdom of lower intelligence and reason,
how can it be justified among human beings, especially when we know that
all have come from the same source and belong to the same household? In
origin and intention of creation mankind is one. Distinctions of race and
color have arisen afterward."
(Shoghi Effendi,
The
Advent of Divine Justice, page 38)
![]()
The world of humanity, too, is like a garden, and humankind are like the many-colored flowers. Therefore, different colors constitute an adornment. In the same way, there are many colors in the realm of animals. Doves are of many colors; nevertheless, they live in utmost harmony. They never look at color; instead, they look at the species. How often white doves fly with black ones. In the same way, other birds and varicolored animals never look at color; they look at the species.
Now ponder this: Animals, despite the fact
that they lack reason and understanding, do not make colors the cause of
conflict. Why should man, who has reason, create conflict? This is wholly
unworthy of him.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 45)
![]()
Among the animals racial prejudice does
not exist. Consider the doves; there is no distinction as to whether it
is an oriental or an occidental dove. The sheep are all of one race; there
is no assumption of distinction between an eastern and a western sheep.
When they meet, they associate with perfect fellowship. If a dove from
the West should go to the Orient, it will associate with the eastern doves
unhesitatingly. There will be no attitude of unwillingness as if saying,
"You belong to the East; I am from the West." Is it reasonable or allowable
that a racial prejudice which is not observed by the animal kingdom should
be entertained by man?
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 299)
![]()
Likewise, we observe that animals which
have undergone training in their sphere of limitation will progress and
advance unmistakably, become more beautiful in appearance and increase
in intelligence. For instance, how intelligent and knowing the Arabian
horse has become through training, even how polite this horse has become
through education. As to the human world: It is more in need of guidance
and education than the lower creatures.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 77)
![]()
In His day, according to prophecy, the
wolf and the lamb were to drink from the same fountain. This was realized
in Christ. The fountain referred to was the Gospel, from which the water
of life gushes forth. The wolf and lamb are opposed and divergent races
symbolized by these animals. Their meeting and association were impossible,
but having become believers in Jesus Christ those who were formerly as
wolves and lambs became united through the words of the Gospel.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 200)
![]()
Lo, the Nightingale of Paradise singeth
upon the twigs of the Tree of Eternity, with holy and sweet melodies, proclaiming
to the sincere ones the glad tidings of the nearness of God
(Baha'u'llah, in
Baha'i
Prayers (US), page 210)
![]()
Should it be God's intention, there would
appear out of the forests of celestial might the lion of indomitable strength
whose roaring is like unto the peals of thunder reverberating in the mountains.
(Baha'u'llah, Tablets
of Baha'u'llah, page 197)
![]()
Regard men as a flock of sheep that need
a shepherd for their protection.
(Baha'u'llah, The
Kitab-i-Aqdas, page 63)
![]()
...a flock of sheep, once scattered, falleth
prey to the wolf, and birds that fly alone will be caught fast in the claws
of the hawk.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, page 278)
![]()
Outwardly they appear as sheep, yet inwardly
they are naught but ravening wolves.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, page 315)
![]()
The birds of men's hearts, however high
they soar, can never hope to attain the heights of His unknowable Essence.
(Baha'u'llah, Gleanings,
page 193)
![]()
The bird seeketh its nest; the nightingale
the charm of the rose; whilst those birds, the hearts of men, content with
transient dust, have strayed far from their eternal nest, and with eyes
turned towards the slough of heedlessness are bereft of the glory of the
divine presence.
(Baha'u'llah, Persian
Hidden Words, page 2)
![]()
For should the birds of the hearts of them
that are nigh unto Thee be ever enabled to soar as long as Thine own overpowering
sovereignty can endure, or to ascend as long as the empire of Thy Divine
holiness can last, they shall, in no wise, be able to transcend the limitations
which a contingent world hath imposed upon them, nor pass beyond its confines.
(Baha'u'llah, Prayers
and Meditations, page 88)
![]()
Ye are even as the bird which soareth,
with the full force of its mighty wings and with complete and joyous confidence,
through the immensity of the heavens, until, impelled to satisfy its hunger,
it turneth longingly to the water and clay of the earth below it, and,
having been entrapped in the mesh of its desire, findeth itself impotent
to resume its flight to the realms whence it came. Powerless to shake off
the burden weighing on its sullied wings, that bird, hitherto an inmate
of the heavens, is now forced to seek a dwelling-place upon the dust. Wherefore,
O My servants, defile not your wings with the clay of waywardness and vain
desires, and suffer them not to be stained with the dust of envy and hate,
that ye may not be hindered from soaring in the heavens of My divine knowledge.
(Baha'u'llah, Gleanings,
page 327)
![]()
We may think of science as one wing and
religion as the other; a bird needs two wings for flight, one alone would
be useless.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Paris
Talks, page 130)
![]()
The world of humanity is possessed of two
wings: the male and the female. So long as these two wings are not equivalent
in strength, the bird will not fly. Until womankind reaches the same degree
as man, until she enjoys the same arena of activity, extraordinary attainment
for humanity will not be realized; humanity cannot wing its way to heights
of real attainment. When the two wings or parts become equivalent in strength,
enjoying the same prerogatives, the flight of man will be exceedingly lofty
and extraordinary.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, page 375)
![]()
The world of humanity has two wings - one
is women and the other men. Not until both wings are equally developed
can the bird fly. Should one wing remain weak, flight is impossible.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, page 302)
![]()
If ye should hunt with beasts or birds
of prey, invoke ye the Name of God when ye send them to pursue their quarry;
for then whatever they catch shall be lawful unto you, even should ye find
it to have died. He, verily, is the Omniscient, the All-Informed. Take
heed, however, that ye hunt not to excess. Tread ye the path of justice
and equity in all things.
(Baha'u'llah, The
Kitab-i-Aqdas, paragraph 60, page 40)
![]()
24. QUESTION: Concerning hunting.
ANSWER: He saith, exalted be He: "If ye
should hunt with beasts or birds of prey" and so forth. Other means, such
as bows and arrows, guns, and similar equipment employed in hunting, are
also included. If, however, traps or snares are used, and the game dieth
before it can be reached, it is unlawful for consumption.
(Baha'u'llah, The
Kitáb-i-Aqdas: Questions and Answers, page 115)
![]()
83. "If ye should hunt with beasts or birds of prey, invoke ye the Name of God when ye send them to pursue their quarry; for then whatever they catch shall be lawful unto you, even should ye find it to have died." # 60
By this law, Baha'u'llah greatly simplifies practices and religious regulations of the past relating to hunting. He has also stated that hunting with such weapons as bows and arrows, guns, and the like, is included in this ruling, but that the consumption of game if it is found dead in a trap or a net is prohibited (Q and A 24).
84. hunt not to excess # 60
While hunting is not forbidden by Baha'u'llah,
He warns against excessive hunting. The Universal House of Justice will,
in due course, have to consider what constitutes an excess in hunting.
(Baha'u'llah, The
Kitáb-i-Aqdas: Notes, pages 202-203)
![]()
There are a number of other situations
in which weapons are needed and can be legitimately used; for instance,
in countries where people hunt for their food and clothing, and in such
sports as archery, marksmanship, and fencing.
(Baha'u'llah, The
Kitáb-i-Aqdas: Notes, page 241)
![]()
137. O thou who art voicing the praises of thy Lord! I have read thy letter, wherein thou didst express astonishment at some of the laws of God, such as that concerning the hunting of innocent animals, creatures who are guilty of no wrong.
Be thou not surprised at this. Reflect upon the inner realities of the universe, the secret wisdoms involved, the enigmas, the inter-relationships, the rules that govern all. For every part of the universe is connected with every other part by ties that are very powerful and admit of no imbalance, nor any slackening whatever. In the physical realm of creation, all things are eaters and eaten: the plant drinketh in the mineral, the animal doth crop and swallow down the plant, man doth feed upon the animal, and the mineral devoureth the body of man. Physical bodies are transferred past one barrier after another, from one life to another, and all things are subject to transformation and change, save only the essence of existence itself - since it is constant and immutable, and upon it is founded the life of every species and kind, of every contingent reality throughout the whole of creation.
Whensoever thou dost examine, through a microscope, the water man drinketh, the air he doth breathe, thou wilt see that with every breath of air, man taketh in an abundance of animal life, and with every draught of water, he also swalloweth down a great variety of animals. How could it ever be possible to put a stop to this process? For all creatures are eaters and eaten, and the very fabric of life is reared upon this fact. Were it not so, the ties that interlace all created things within the universe would be unravelled.
And further, whensoever a thing is destroyed,
and decayeth, and is cut off from life, it is promoted into a world that
is greater than the world it knew before. It leaveth, for example, the
life of the mineral and goeth forward into the life of the plant; then
it departeth out of the vegetable life and ascendeth into that of the animal,
following which it forsaketh the life of the animal and riseth into the
realm of human life, and this is out of the grace of thy Lord, the Merciful,
the Compassionate.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Selections
from the Writings of `Abdu'l-Baha, pages 156-158)
![]()
As humanity progresses, meat will be used
less and less, for the teeth of man are not carnivorous. For example, the
lion is endowed with carnivorous teeth, which are intended for meat, and
if meat be not found, the lion starves. The lion cannot graze; its teeth
are of different shape. The digestive system of the lion is such that it
cannot receive nourishment save through meat. The eagle has a crooked beak,
the lower part shorter than the upper. It cannot pick up grain; it cannot
graze; therefore, it is compelled to partake of meat. The domestic animals
have herbivorous teeth formed to cut grass, which is their fodder. The
human teeth, the molars, are formed to grind grain. The front teeth, the
incisors, are for fruits, etc. It is, therefore, quite apparent according
to the implements for eating that man's food is intended to be grain and
not meat. When mankind is more fully developed, the eating of meat will
gradually cease.
(`Abdu'l-Baha, Promulgation
of Universal Peace, pages 170-171)
![]()
1028. Regarding the eating of animal flesh and abstinence therefrom, know thou of a certainty that, in the beginning of creation, God determined the food of every living being, and to eat contrary to that determination is not approved. For instance, beasts of prey, such as the wolf, lion and leopard, are endowed with ferocious, tearing instruments, such as hooked talons and claws. From this it is evident that the food of such beasts is meat. If they were to attempt to graze, their teeth would not cut the grass, neither could they chew the cud, for they do not have molars. Likewise, God hath given to the four-footed grazing animals such teeth as reap the grass like a sickle, and from this we understand that the food of these species of animal is vegetable. They cannot chase and hunt down other animals. The falcon hath a hooked beak and sharp talons; the hooked beak preventeth him from grazing, therefore his food also is meat.
But now coming to man, we see he hath neither
hooked teeth nor sharp nails or claws, nor teeth like iron sickles. From
this it becometh evident and manifest that the food of man is cereals and
fruit. Some of the teeth of man are like millstones to grind the grain,
and some are sharp to cut the fruit. Therefore he is not in need of meat,
nor is he obliged to eat it. Even without eating meat he would live with
the utmost vigour and energy. For example, the community of the Brahmins
in India do not eat meat; notwithstanding this they are not inferior to
other nations in strength, power, vigour, outward senses or intellectual
virtues. Truly, the killing of animals and the eating of their meat is
somewhat contrary to pity and compassion, and if one can content oneself
with cereals, fruit, oil and nuts, such as pistachios, almonds and so on,
it would undoubtedly be better and more pleasing.
(From a Tablet -
translated from the Persian)
(`Abdu'l-Baha, in
Health and Healing, Compilation of Compilations, page 462)
![]()
1029. Thou hast written regarding the four
canine teeth in man, saying that these teeth, two in the upper jaw and
two in the lower, are for the purpose of eating meat. Know thou that these
four teeth are not created for meat-eating, although one can eat meat with
them. All the teeth of man are made for eating fruit, cereals, and vegetables.
These four teeth, however, are designed for breaking hard shells, such
as those of almonds. But eating meat is not forbidden or unlawful, nay,
the point is this, that it is possible for man to live without eating meat
and still be strong. Meat is nourishing and containeth the elements of
herbs, seeds, and fruits; therefore sometimes it is essential for the sick
and for the rehabilitation of health. There is no objection in the Law
of God to the eating of meat if it is required. So if thy constitution
is rather weak and thou findest meat useful, thou mayest eat it.
(From a Tablet -
translated from the Persian)
(`Abdu'l-Baha, in
Health and Healing, Compilation of Compilations, page 463)
![]()
1052. "What will be the food of the future?"
"Fruit and grains. The time will come when meat will no longer be eaten.
Medical science is only in its infancy, yet it has shown that our natural
diet is that which grows out of the ground. The people will gradually develop
up to the condition of this natural food."
(Julia M. Grundy.
"Ten Days in the Light of Akka", rev. ed. Wilmette: Baha'i Publishing Trust,
1979, pp. 8-9)
(`Abdu'l-Baha, in
Health and Healing, Compilation of Compilations, page 475)
![]()
Likewise there is nothing in the teachings
about whether people should eat their food cooked or raw; exercise or not
exercise; resort to specific therapies or not; nor is it forbidden to eat
meat.
(Shoghi Effendi,
in Health, Healing, and the Devotional Attitude, Compilation of Compilations,
page 481)
![]()
In regard to the question as to whether
people ought to kill animals for food or not, there is no explicit statement
in the Baha'i Sacred Scriptures (as far as I know) in favour or against
it. It is certain, however, that if man can live on a purely vegetarian
diet and thus avoid killing animals, it would be much preferable. This
is, however, a very controversial question and the Baha'is are free to
express their views on it.
(9 July 1931)
(Shoghi Effendi,
in Health, Healing, and the Devotional Attitude, Compilation of Compilations,
page 476)
![]()
"In this connection the House of Justice
instructs us to say that in a Tablet in which He stresses the need for
kindness to animals, Abdu'l-Baha states that it would be permissible to
perform an operation on a living animal for the purposes of research even
if the animal were killed thereby, but that the animal must be well anaesthetized
and that the utmost care must be exercised that it does not suffer."
(From a letter of
the Universal House of Justice to the National Spiritual Assembly of Italy,
March 9, 1978: Some Aspects of Health, Healing, Nutrition and Related Matters,
April 1984, p. 16)
(Lights of Guidance,
page 294)
![]()
"The Guardian fully sympathizes with your
repulsion against any torture to animals. However, he feels that as there
are human beings being tortured much worse than animals all over the world,
often physically, and more often mentally, that it is more important for
the Baha'is to concentrate on what will free man from the cruelty and injustice
which oppress him, rather than animals. Once we change human hearts, there
will be no more cruelty to animals, and medical research will be carried
out in a way which will eliminate as much suffering in experiments as possible."
(From a letter written
on behalf of Shoghi Effendi to an individual believer, December 27, 1952)
![]()
"The Universal House of Justice has received your letter of 19th January 1978 enquiring the Baha'i point of view on the vivisection of animals. The beloved Guardian was asked a similar question to which his secretary replied on his behalf, on 29 November 1955: `As there is no definite and conclusive statement on Vivisection in the Baha'i Teachings, this is a matter which the International House of Justice will have to pass upon in the future.'
"The House of Justice does not wish to legislate upon this matter at the present time. It is left to the consciences of the individual friends, who should make their decisions in light of the teachings concerning animals and their treatment.
"In this connection the House of Justice
instructs us to say that in a Tablet in which He stresses the need for
kindness to animals, Abdu'l-Baha states that it would be permissible to
perform an operation on a living animal for the purposes of research even
if the animal were killed thereby, but that the animal must be well anaesthetized
and that the utmost care must be exercised that it does not suffer."
(From a letter of
the Universal House of Justice to the National Spiritual Assembly of Italy,
March 9, 1978: Some Aspects of Health, Healing, Nutrition and Related Matters,
April 1984, p. 16)
(Lights of Guidance,
pages 293-294)
Return
to IEF Home Page
International Environment
Forum - Updated 24 November 2004