![]()
|
Responding to Climate Change:
Scientific Realities, Spiritual Imperatives
Heather Eaton, Ph.D.
St. Paul University, Ottawa, Canada
12 October 2007

Climate Change: Introduction
- players
- aspects: political, cultural, economic, ideological
- ethical and religious issues.
Role of religion / spirituality
- three caveats
- three reflections for conversation
One: Ethics
- transformation of the self
- social ethics
- ecological ethics
Two: Religions are in Transition
- magnitude of the challenges
- reality maps are obsolete
- Euro-western worldviews: habits of mind
- anthropocentrism
- assess our religious and spiritual maps
- reclaim Earth spirituality
Three: Spiritual Awakening; New visions
- spirituality
- spiritual vision adequate for our ecological era
- Earth’s climate systems
- contemplate the elegance of the Earth
- spiritual and moral awakening, radical political actions.
- religions need to become self aware and ecologically literate.

Speaking Notes:
Thank you for
this time together and thank you to those who worked hard to organize
such important conversations about the concerns of our times.
No need to reiterate how challenging and difficult this era on Earth is becoming.
Predictions range from very worrisome to catastrophic.
The indicators
vary - temperature changes, weather changes, glacial melting, confused
migratory patterns, and species extinctions.
I heard yesterday that the permafrost is melting much sooner than ‘predicted’.
Causes of climate change - more complex when we move beyond the scientific conversations.
Many climate change players, the funders of research, the politics of protocols, the energy giants, the civic groups.
Reveals multi-layered agendas, competing interests, and shifting power.
For example,
last week eight groups of evangelical Christians downplayed the
potential problems of global climate change, including six
organizations that received a total of $2.32 million in donations from
Exxon Mobil over the last three years.
Climate Change is Political:
If, as suggests
Ursula Franklin, we are in a state of occupation by an army of
marketeers, and our governments are puppets in the hands of
corporations, then democracy is at great risk. Many predict that
without functional democracies around the world, effective action
against or adaptation to climate change will be impossible.
Quote: (William Ruckelshaus and Henry Kendall, 1990 Nobel Prize for physics)
“long
before the systems of the planet buckle, democracy will disintegrate
under the stress of ecological disasters and their social
consequences.”
Climate change is cultural:
We live in a sea
of cultural ideologies that nurture notions of social well being in
terms of progress, economic growth, unlimited materialism,
industrialization and technology, all contributing to climate
disruptions.
Climate change is about economics,
consumerism, resources for adaptations, disparities, and many other
dimensions of human engagement with the world, of how we image and
construct the world.
Climate change is also an ethical and religious issue.
What can religions offer to ethical frameworks on climate change? Lots to discuss and I will offer a few reflections.
Three caveats:
One, religions are many things, and are vast chronologically, in diversity and in impact.
Two: There is no
pure religion outside of historical forms, and they have constructive
and destructive legacies. The best of religions are rarely
embodied, and are fraught with bias, contradictions and ambiguities.
Three: We cannot just apply religions to climate change the way we apply cream.
I offer three reflections for our conversation on religion / spirituality and climate change.
The first is about ethics.
First Point: The Role of Ethics in Religions:
- three aspects of ethics
a) Transformation of the Self
Religious teachings are concerned about interior human dynamics, such as desire:
- of how
to educate and discipline our desires for power and success,
greed, the need to accumulation of wealth, our appetite for more
- religions teach of how to be aware of arrogance and ignorance,
- to attend to the power of our will, thoughts, fears, and even the insatiable quest for happiness.
Religions teach
about kindness, mindfulness. Buddhism teaches how to discipline
the mind and emotions such that we ‘ doing no harm’ and
develop compassion - the ethical core of peace.
Religions talk about regret, repentance, forgiveness,
about solidarity with others,
The Bahá’i tradition has much wisdom on this self transformation
Confucians consider this cultivating interiority.
Religions can
become engaged in this cultivation of the self, this education of the
whole person - all of which is needed in how we act as we intervene on
climate change.
Some traditions teach of cultivating courage to oppose oppression, a second aspect of ethics.
b) Social ethics:
Complex problems
such as those enmeshed with climate change cannot be solved at the
personal level. We need social analysis, and tools to perceive
the ideological, political and economic aspects,
We need a deeper understanding of the inequities – which are often systemic
Here there is a vast array of religious teachings on equity, justice, the common good, of attending to the marginalized,
- on the need to assess public policy in terms of the impact on those who will benefit least,
- to consider the implications for seven generations, as do some North American Indigenous traditions
Historically religions have joined movements for progressive social change, and can be prophetic.
The liberation from oppression is a religious task, as is confronting oppressive systems, people and ideologies.
Teachings and tools for non-violent resistance, working for peace,
Even putting one’s life on the line
These liberation themes are in Jewish, Christian Buddhism and certainly others traditions)
And these efforts support justice and democracy
Religions speak
of sacrifice - not popular... but what are we willing to sacrifice to
mitigate climate change, and to lessen the effects on those most
affected? What about other species?
3rd aspect of ethics.
c) Ecological Ethics:
Religions have
not developed insights for ecological concerns. They are ill equipped
to respond to this magnitude of crisis. However, there are some
ecological ethics that can be retrieved. For example, most
religions have ethics to live within the limits and rhythms of the
natural world, and that recognize that our existence depends on right
relations with the natural world.
Religions have teachings about learning from the Earth, and awakening to a sacred presence in the natural world.
Climate change
is not just about humans, or even predominantly about humans. It
is affecting countless species, many of whom will become extinct as a
result. Ethical questions arise about how religions view the
greater than human world? - this vast community of
other animals. Do we have ethics equipped to address extensive
habitat loss? The suffering of other sentient beings? Of
species extinction?
What if one cause of climate change is our inability to have an I-thou relationship with the natural world?
Unless we can
sense the sacred within the natural world, I fear that the ethics we
revive will be insufficient. We need more than ethics from
religion.
Second Point : Religions are in Transition
Extraordinary
work is being done in the field of religion and ecology. There are all
kinds of initiatives, reinterpretations, and innovations. Religions are
bringing teachings, texts, symbols, rituals and ethics to bear on
ecological issues. It is also clear that other
questions are emerging.
One of the tasks
of religion is to read the signs of the times. We are in a sea
change of a magnitude that is difficult even to describe. Fast
changes, radical pluralities, multi-religious encounters, inadequate
theories of understanding truths:
- Post-colonial subjectivities confronting hegemonic globalization,
- Cultural diversifies intermingling with a global consciousness.
- Inter-religious exchanges, blending, and conflict - daily reality
And we are entering an era of an ecological crisis unprecedented in 65 million years, of which climate change is only one part:
- Sixth
extinction period, amidst desertification, loss of biodiversity,
pollution and toxins everywhere, water concerns, restructuring genetic
codes..
And the list goes on and on...
Those who
‘work’ in religion are struggling to respond to these
realities. But are religions adequate to the task?
It is evident that religions are in transition - in their self understanding, and within a new global context.
Rabbi Schachter states: “Many
religious structures have become ossified remnants of another time. All
traditional systems - Moses, Jesus, Mohammed, and Buddha - were
embedded in the social and economic systems in which they arose. Their
reality maps are obsolete.”
Some call for spirituality not religion (Dalai Lama), or wisdom and ethics rather than dogma.
Some say we are
entering a second axial age - a new phase of religious consciousness in
which original insights and energies are possible
In response to
the uncertainties surrounding religion we see a rise of fundamentalism
as well as bold inter-religious collaboration:
- where religions are both a weapon and a tool of peace and non-violence
- where religious claims compete for supremacy, or search for deeper notions of truth and reality
Signs of our times....
Thomas Berry says
Religion as we
know it is over. Religions in there current forms cannot respond
to this level of crisis, but we cannot respond without them.
What does this mean?
Albert Einstein : Problems
cannot be solved at the level of consciousness in which they were
created. We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if
human kind is to survive.
There is a great
need to examine the worldviews out of which we consider
religion. We need to re-examine religious worldviews, and
assumption about reality,
For example, Western worldviews are filled with dualistic thinking: such as
matter is in opposition to spirit,
thought / emotion,
culture / nature,
humans / animals,
humans / nature ( humans... the environment)
These are habits
of mind, how we think about the world, but they do not represent
reality. Within this thought pattern we cannot see our
inter-relatedness, our dependence, or that matter and spirit in
intimately interwoven,
Or that we are in a continuum with Earth, and Earth processes, Earth Life..
Or that we are animals, one primate among others.
Because we separate humans from the natural world, we think of the ecological crisis as one of resources,
We need to
confront the anthropocentrism – our notions of human supremacy
within Christian, Jewish, Islam, Bahá’í traditions.
and the emphasis on humanity’s spiritual transcendence over the natural world.
As a result of
how we understand ourselves in the scheme of things, we have a
diminished awareness of a sacred indwelling presence in the natural
world.
This may be why we have few ethical restraints on destroying the natural world.
To respond to climate change, we need to assess our religious and spiritual maps.
As well, it is
urgent for religions to reclaim that the beauty and elegance of the
natural world have been inspirational and revelatory of the divine
since time immemorial.
To sense a
sacred presence within the very life-processes of the earth was common
throughout human history. It is only in recent times that this has not
been so.
The natural
world is a primary place of revelation and religious experience - the
sky, clouds, winds, water, deserts, trees, animals, speak the ways of
the divine, sacred, mystery holy. They reveal. They evoke wonder
and awe.
Wonder and awe educate our spiritual sensibilities, our mind and ethics.
These are a spontaneous response to anyone who spends time in the natural world
Wonder and awe lead to reverence, and reverence leads to responsibility and ethics.
But even this is not enough to respond to climate change.
Problems cannot be solved at the level of consciousness in which they were created. More is required of religion.
We need a new vision. The Jewish and Christian traditions say, “without a vision, the people perish.”
We need a vision
that inspires and guides us, shapes our values, assists our decision
making. We need a spiritual awakening.
Third Point: Spiritual Awakening:
We need a spiritual vision that teaches us how to be present to the Earth, on Earth’s terms.
Spiritualities come from the realm of insights rather than data. Spiritualities are teachers of consciousness:
Spirituality is
like breathing, as intimate and as vital as breath. It is about
desire, a zest for life. The ability to feel awe and
wonder. To experience reverence in the face of the immensity and
elegance of existence.
Developing a
spiritual consciousness is often described as moving from death to
life, from sleep to awake, from illusion to enlightenment, from
confinement to liberation, from confusion to clarity.
Why is it
legitimate to view life as a commodity and to discuss ecological ruin
in credit and debit terms? Why is life a market, not an
intrinsic value?
The governing
hyper-rational, pragmatic economic worldview needs to be countered with
a more powerful and alluring vision of life.
A spiritual
vision adequate for our ecological era requires an awakening to the
Earth. Analysis of climate change is not enough.
As says Rabbi Heschel “What we cannot comprehend by analysis, we become aware of in awe.”
Briefly let’s look at climate change from a new angle.
Earths climate systems, dynamic, of staggering complexity, ingenuity, and sustaining powers.
The
earth’s climate is a highly sophisticated multi-leveled system
integrated with an ingenious hydrologic cycle, and inter-related with
all life forms.
Earth’s climate - gone through extensive development.
Initially unstable...4.4 billion years ago. It was gaseous, no earth crust, no oceans.
The crust formed slowly, amidst huge volcanic activity
But early Earth’s atmosphere could not support oxygen based life..
Over millions of years - the formation of the great oceans.
The beginnings
of life - single cells existed for a billion years... then a change - 3
billion years ago...eukaryote cells - photosynthesis...
Climate systems restabilized the carbon dioxide levels with higher levels of oxygen.
This era – the Cenozoic era -.. 65 million years ago
Most complex, diverse, inter-dependent flourishing of life.
Earth’s
climate system is delicately poised and can support an elaborate array
of life forms that took millions of years of experimentation, refining,
and balancing
Climate - part of an elaborate Earth dynamic.
What little we know of Earth’s intricacies dazzles the human imagination
Even the fragment we know puts all our technologies to shame.
Earth’s climate processes, command some respect, if not reverence.
If we could
stand back and contemplate the elegance of the Earth - that we are
emergent from these great processes this inspires and
energizes
This informs and sustains a vision - a place from which to think and act.
Human superiority fades in the face of a deeper appreciation for the wondrous, reality of life-systems on earth.
Such awareness
leads to a profound spiritual and moral awakening, and radical
political actions. We need a deep ecological
awakening - I don’t know if less will be enough.
To see and know the earth as such requires a new way of perceiving,
and a confidence that to experience the Earth as sacred is not quaint, irrelevant, heretical or idealistic.
To understand,
even minimally, the immense and elaborate planetary climate systems is
stunning and breath-taking. To contemplate the Earth - from the
microbiotic and genetic levels to the dinosaurs, the processes and
life-forms is a fantasy beyond human imagination. If we attend, even
momentarily, to the dynamics of water, the inventiveness of birds, the
ingenuity of insect communication, and the emotions of mammals, how is
it possible not to be overwhelmed by the creativity, diversity, power
and beauty?
Religions are about awakening to these deeper dimensions of reality. It is a spiritual imperative for our time.
Religions have a
crucial role to play in our era. Further, we cannot leave the
public debates about religion and the ecological crisis in the hands of
the right wing religious agenda. But not all religion is good
religion. Superficial notions of religion or the reiteration of
religious dogma will not suffice. Protectionist and imperialist
stances prevent common efforts. Religions need to become self
aware, and ecologically literate.
We need a vision that teaches us how to be present to the Earth, on Earth’s terms..
If we can
cultivate awareness of this magnificent Earth, and see ourselves as
members of this Earth community, then we will find spiritual resources
that we have not yet imagined.
Thank you.

Return
to IEF
Home Page .
.
Return to Papers List
Last updated 17 October 2007