![]()
Paper presented at the plenary IEF Symposium |
INSTITUTIONALIZING SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION
Sylvia I. Karlsson
Tampere, Finland

OUTLINE
The role of institutions
Institutions and consumer citizenship
Designing and changing institutions
Conclusions
The role of instititions
Are knowledge and values enough to transform our consumption patterns in more sustainable directions and make us remain committed to act as responsible consumer citizens, to act consistently indifferent situations and over time?
No, for at least five reasons linked to institutions.
Institutions are “systems of rules, decision-making procedures, and programs that give rise to social practices, assign roles to the participants in those practices, and guide interactions among theoccupants of the relevant roles” (Young 1999)
Do we explain the behavior of individuals by the institutions that surround them or do individual action explain the design of institutions?
Institutions and consumer citizenship
Are knowledge and values enough to transform our consumption patterns in more sustainable directions and make us remain committed to act as responsible consumer citizens, to act consistently in different situations and over time?No, because...
1. Our decisions not only influenced by the knowledge and values we have, but they are also influenced institutions of what is considered desired, acceptable or allowed consumer behavior in our families,communities or countries.
2. It is very difficult for individual consumers to acquire sufficient and appropriate information.
3. For consumers to be able to consume sustainably there needs to be options to do so, alternative products. And these options are made available (or not) depending on the institutions and structuresin society.
4. Even if there are alternatives, how attractive and available those alternatives are also depends institutions.
5. Many of the sustainability challenges require consistent incremental decisions and policy over many years, even decades to affect change and this can be difficult to accomplish throughconsumer pressure only.
Changing institutions
Institutions have a certain robustness within them, making them slow to change. If we manage to create stable institutions which are effective in influencing behavior, they may thus encourage certain patterns of behavior which could facilitate consistencyover time.
What do institutions look like which take our societies in the right direction towards sustainability and what can we base them on?
Which institutions are most important to change, and which ones would be easiest and fastest to change?
| Institution type | Examples | Proneness to change |
| Constitutional | Favoured type of agricultural system (including system of pest management) | Very difficult to change, requiring significant political will at global and national level involving multiple sectors and actors, or widespread changes in consumer preferences |
| Collective-choice | National, regional or international laws and regulations banning or restricting certain pesticides. | Moderately difficult to change with large variation in time and resources required Relatively easy to implement as it involves few sectors and actors. |
| Operational | Global (or national) guidelines for safe use such as codes of conduct, label instructions or safety sheets. | Relatively easy to change with few resources and within a short time span. Difficult and costly to implement/enforce at local level, particularly at global scale. |
The crunch-point is of course that in order to change the institutions to encourage these kind of values, we need to change the values in society.
For discussion
What type of institutions are needed for consumer citizenship to be more than a passing buzzword/trend/fashion that ends with the fundingof the network?
Which of the three types of institutions can the network itself focus on changing?

Return
to IEF
Home Page .
.
Return to Papers List
Last updated 23 May 2006