![]()
|
New American Dream

![]()
Can Americans enjoy a high-quality life while consuming less? Can we embrace a new "American Dream" of a thriftier, more conserving lifestyle, with more time for friends, family, hobbies and community life?
The Center for a New American Dream opened its national office this year to help Americans start a new conversation about the social and environmental effects of our materialistic lifestyle and the question of "how much is enough?" Ellen Furnari, executive director of the Center, noted that the United Nations 1992 Earth Summit challenged developed nations, declaring that "the major cause of the continued degradation of the global environment is the unsustainable pattern of consumption and production, particularly in industrialized countries." Unfortunately, says Furnari, the United States and most other industrialized nations have not lived up to the promises they made at the 1992 Earth Summit. "We all need to address more seriously the issue of consumption," she notes.
Consuming 300 shopping
bags of resources each week
A
report released this past
April by the World Resources Institute of Washington, D.C., and three
international
research groups, said a survey of consumption patterns in four
developed
countries found that: The average American every week uses the
equivalent
of 300 shopping bags filled with natural resources for food, shelter,
energy
and transportation. Americans end up paying about $200 billion a year
on
cleanup of resource extraction, pollution and wastes.
Furnari
says, "Our research
discovered that a majority of people agreed with the statement, 'I
believe
my own buying habits have a negative effect on the environment.' We
learned
that people will consider changes in their consumption habits when they
see clear links between our materialistic way of life and environmental
degradation. "This center has been founded to inspire a new dialogue
about
consumption's daily impact on the environment and our own lives and to
provide tools for people to change and shape a new American Dream,"
says
Furnari.
Many are disappointed
with work-and-shop treadmill
Betsy
Taylor, of Takoma
Park, Md., executive director of the Merck Family Fund and one of the
Center's
founders, says, "The American dream of having more and more is killing
us and our environment. People are hungry to talk about their
disappointment
with the work-and-shop consumer treadmill, and how to find a better
balance
in their lives." The Center's birth stems from a major conference in
1995
on materialism and the environment. "Our research showed that many
Americans
believe we are on the wrong track, focusing too much on acquiring
things
while our families and our environment suffer," Taylor says.
Survey: materialism, greed
dominate American life
One
of the key findings
of the research, conducted in 1995 by the Harwood Group for the Merck
Family
Fund, stated: Americans believe our priorities are out of whack. People
of all backgrounds share certain fundamental concerns about the values
they see driving our society. They believe materialism, greed, and
selfishness
increasingly dominate American life, crowding out a more meaningful set
of values centered on family, responsibility, and community. People
express
a strong desire for a greater sense of balance in their lives-not to
repudiate
material gain, but to bring it more into proportion with the
non-material
rewards of life.
Based
on focus groups and
a national public opinion survey, the research also revealed that
people
feel the material side of the American Dream is spinning out of
control,
that the effort to keep up with higher-spending neighbors is
increasingly
unhealthy and destructive.
Some other key findings
of note:
Huge
majorities of Americans cite responsibility, family life, and
friendship
as key guiding principles for themselves.
Most
people have not thought deeply about the ecological implications of
their own lifestyles; yet there is an intuitive sense that our
propensity
for "more, more, more," is unsustainable.
Over 90%
of people agreed that an underlying cause of environmental problems
is that "we focus too much on getting what we want now and not enough
on
future generations."
Over 85%
agreed that "today's youth are too focused on buying and consuming
things."
Almost
two-thirds of respondents agreed with the statement: "I would like
to have more
balance
in my life."
We're working longer hours
One
of the new organization's
board members is economist Juliet Schor, who wrote The
Overworked American
(1992). "Millions of Americans are exhausting themselves trying to
reach
an increasingly unattainable American Dream," she says. Her research,
for
example, showed that between 1969 and 1987 the average employed person
put in an extra 163 hours a year on the job. "As more and more income
is
required to achieve a middle class standard of living, many Americans
find
themselves working longer hours, and going into debt, to reach those
standards.
At the same time, that standard of living turns out to be extremely
destructive
of the environment, both because of what and how much we consume,"
Schor
says. "Downshifting, living more simply, and being more in tune with
the
environment and inner goals have become extremely significant trends in
contemporary America," she notes. "Millions of Americans are reducing
the
stress of their work lives and are achieving more balance in their
lives.
Millions more want to, but haven't yet seen their way there," Schor
says.
More stuff just isn't
doing it
Board
member Alan Durning
of Seattle, Wash., writes, "More stuff just isn't doing it for many
people.
While many families are stuck in poverty, others are finding that the
race
to have it all leaves them feeling empty." Durning says, "The time we
spend
driving, shopping, working, and watching TV has increased in recent
years,
while the time spent in conversation, at family meals, and in informal
visits with neighbors has decreased."
The Center intends to help people examine the impact of our high-consumption lifestyles on the environment. "We Americans now consume our body weight in raw materials each day," Durning says, "materials extracted from farms, forests, grasslands and mines. Most of us must consume less if the environment is to have a chance."
![]()
Guide
Questions
Identify & explain
all social, economic
and environmental principles
Analyze the article in the
context of
"systems thinking"
Draw a diagram showing the
connection
between various parts of the system
![]()
Return
to IEF
Home Page .
.
Return to e-learning centre
Last updated 12 April 2006