Re: 1000 year no manif ???

w.scott23@genie.geis.com
Wed, Feb 15 1995 21:07:33 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Brian Roberts: "Obscene music, etc. (was: Questions, Questions)"
Previous message: Roger Reini: "Re: Source needed re: Number of Wives"
Maybe in reply to: w.scott23@genie.geis.com: "1000 year no manif ???"
Next in thread: Bayan Monadjem: "Re: 1000 year no manif ???"

Dear Audil,

About the term "last" that you've been discussing. This is the meaning
almost every Muslim has given me. It's their excuse for not looking at
Baha'u'llah's claim. Muhammad is the Seal of the Prophets, which they
interpret to mean last forever and ever. All I'm doing is agreeing with them
to a certain extent. He was the last nabi (prophet) (all rasuls are nabis)
but not the last rasul (Messenger). I don't believe all nabis are rasuls,
although I know quite a few Muslims do. There does seem to be some confusion
here. The Baha'i writings explain it in the most logical way, but of course
I may not be doing the same. :)

Love and peace, Wendy---{-@
W.Scott23@GEnie.GEIS.com

Next message: Brian Roberts: "Obscene music, etc. (was: Questions, Questions)"
Previous message: Roger Reini: "Re: Source needed re: Number of Wives"
Maybe in reply to: w.scott23@genie.geis.com: "1000 year no manif ???"
Next in thread: Bayan Monadjem: "Re: 1000 year no manif ???"